Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2016, Page: 59-64
Impact Performance of W-beam Guardrail Supported by Different Shaped Posts
Tso-Liang Teng, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hsiuping University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
Cho-Chung Liang, Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, Taiwan
Ching-Yu Hsu, Department of Marine Mechanical Engineering, ROC Naval Academy, Taiwan
Chien-Jong Shih, Department of Mechanical and Electro-Mechanical Engineering, Tam-Kang University, Taipei, Tawan
Thanh-Tung Tran, Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, Taiwan
Received: Apr. 10, 2016;       Published: Apr. 11, 2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.14      View  4873      Downloads  215
This study applied the finite element code LS-DYNA for evaluating the crashworthiness of W-beam guardrail. Four crash test simulations were conducted for evaluating the safety performance of the W-beam guardrail with four different post configuration according to the European standard EN1317. The results showed that the best performance was demonstrated by the sigma-shaped posts and the I-shaped posts absorbed the lowest amount of impact energy. The optimal result was registered by the barrier with sigma-shaped posts, which demonstrated a lower ASI value and higher energy crash absorption than the other models did.
Roadside Safety, Energy Absorption, Crashworthiness, LS-DYNA, EN1317
To cite this article
Tso-Liang Teng, Cho-Chung Liang, Ching-Yu Hsu, Chien-Jong Shih, Thanh-Tung Tran, Impact Performance of W-beam Guardrail Supported by Different Shaped Posts, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, pp. 59-64. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.14
European Committee for Standardization, European Standard EN 1317-1, EN 1317-2, Road Restraint Systems, 2010.
Safe Direction. Protecting Life & Property. W-beam guardrail semi-rigid protection. Product manual. Ref: PM 003/01.
Ali Osman Atahan, Ayhan Oner Yucel, Muhanmet Musab Erdem. Crash testing and evaluation of a new generation L1 containment level guardrail. Engineering Failure Analysis 38 (2014) 25-37.
Tso-Liang Teng, Cho-Chung Liang, Thanh-Tung Tran. Effect of various W-beam guardrail post spacing and rail heights on safety performance. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 7(11) 1-16.
LS-DYNA Keyword user’s manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2007.
LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore 2006.
Finite Element Model Archive, FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center. 2008. Http:// (2008 November, accessed 1 Dec, 2013)
K Habibagahi and J A Langer, ‘Horizontal Subgrade Modulus of Granular Soils’, in Laterally Loaded Deep Foundations, Langer, Mosely and Thompson, eds., ASTM Publication Code No. 04-835000-38, American Society for Testing Materials, 1984, pp. 21-34.
Plaxico, G. S. Patzner and M H Ray. Finite element modelling of guardrail timber posts and the post-soil interaction. In Transportation Research Record 1647, p.p. 139-146 (1998).
Plaxico, C. A., G. S. Patzner and M. H. Ray, “Effects of post and soil strength on the performance of the modified eccentric loader breakaway cable terminal (MELT)” (1999).
C. A. Plaxico, R. M. Hackett and W. Uddin, Simulation of a Vehicle Impacting a Modified Thrie-Beam Guardrail, In Transportation Research Board 1599,National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1997.
Texas Transport Institude, TTI. Test risk assessment program (TRAP) version 2.2 user’s manual. July 2002.
Browse journals by subject